How is the geologic column used in relative dating
However, unlike astronomy in its early stages, geology did not promise a stability and permanence for the world that could easily be read back into the scriptural notion of a directly creative and eternal God.
[*] Benot de Maillet (1659-1738), in his , published from 1749 onward, were among the first to propose that the Earth was formed by the slow action of natural causes.This eventually brought Buffon into conflict with the religious establishment of his day, which he sidestepped by paying lip service to Biblical Literalism while going on with his work undeterred.Worse, from the perspective of Biblical Literalism, this same historical thinking fed back into and was reinforced by astronomy with the development of the nebular hypothesis of the formation of the solar system by Pierre-Simon Marquis de Laplace (1749-1827) and others.From there, such thinking eventually spread to biology, the last great bastion of creationism in science to fall.It has a rich and extensive history of success in both increasing our knowledge of the world and proving its worth with many practical applications.In short, it works in obvious and easily demonstrable ways.
William Smith (1769-1839), a civil engineer involved in the construction of canals in England, showed the utility of geology to a particularly important economic activity of his day by preparing the first detailed geological map in 1815.
The economic importance of geology continues into our own day in fields such as oil exploration and mining.
s noted in the Introduction, our intent was to continue to add to our collection of quote mines.
This is the fourth such addition and it primarily concerns an area of intense concern by young-Earth creationists: the geologic column.
There are a number of fairly obvious reasons for this concern on their part.
Geology was, after astronomy, one of the first sciences to be organized as a professional study of nature along modern lines.